Subject: RE: Should SVR4 dynamically-linked executables work?
To: 'current-users' <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: John Maier <JohnAM@datastorm.com>
Date: 01/22/1996 12:24:00
So to get Solaris binaries functioning on NetBSD, do I need to copy the
libraries into /emul/ibmcs2/.
Then do I need to do a ldconfig /emul/ibmcs2/usr/lib ?
I am getting an, Exec format error. Wrong Architecture, with
dynamically-linked files but statically-linked files like csh and cal are
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 1996 1:04 PM
Cc: tls; current-users
Subject: Re: Should SVR4 dynamically-linked executables work?
Frank van der Linden said:
>All Solaris 2.4 i386 binaries work just fine for me.. You might be
>the dynamic linker? I can't imagine that something would change that
>from 2.4 to 2.5 that the emulation doesn't work anymore.
This is good, since Solaris x86 binaries don't seem to work consistantly
well on Solaris 2.4 for x86. Solaris 2.x x86 is awful. At my previous
job we found that dynamically linked SVR4 binaries from other SVR4 intel
ports just plain don't work on Solaris x86 because the X11 shared
are not quite the same...
Rick Kelly firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com