Subject: Re: Autonice bugging my but!
To: matthew green <>
From: James Graham - Systems Mangler <>
List: current-users
Date: 01/17/1996 11:22:20
#define AUTHOR " (matthew green)"

 * i may have already said this:  sysctl this instead  :-)

What does a sysctl for autonicing buy us?  It doesn't make sense
to dynamically tune it, really.  If you're switching your machine
from a single-user passive environment to more busy surroundings,
you're going to have to tune a hell of a lot more than the autonice
conditionals.  You'll probably want to down-tune as well if you go
the other way.  In either case, as it currently stands, since there
is a lot of stuff which is pre-allocated, a kernel recompile is probably

 * .mrg.

#undef AUTHOR	/* " (matthew green)" */

Timesharing is dead.
Microsoft Windows-NT is going to take over the desktop completely.
UNIX will no longer exist.
And monkeys might fly out of my butt.