Subject: Re: kernel & libkvm [was IIci success]
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Bert Driehuis <email@example.com>
Date: 01/17/1996 00:30:12
>> We don't seem to have anything that absolutely relies on procfs or
Hmmm, I'd hate to become dependant on procfs. Solaris' ps uses /proc, and
it'll hapily tell you there are no processes if you unmount /proc. Yikes.
And there's of course the kernel dump issue.
I think a ps which would use /proc if available, and fall back to nlist
otherwise would be very nice, but I don't volunteer to maintain it... "Bug
kern/32767: ps on i386 shows bogus info in WCHAN field without /proc
-- Bert Driehuis
Bert Driehuis God, grant me the serenity to accept the things
firstname.lastname@example.org I can't change, courage to change the things I
can, and the wisdom to know the difference.