Subject: Re: Autonice bugging my but!
To: matthew green <jaywon!eterna.com.au!mrg@life.ai.mit.edu>
From: David Gilbert <pci!jaywon!dgilbert@life.ai.mit.edu>
List: current-users
Date: 01/16/1996 22:47:16
[ about the autonice 'feature' ]
>>>>> "matthew" == matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au> writes:
matthew> i agree. i totally hate it.
[ kernel patch deleted ]
Well... I can see where this is of some value to some people
running NetBSD in a heavily multiuser environment. But on a Sun4/260
(and, I suspect even more on Sun3/hp300/Amiga/atari) it is pretty
trivial to rack up 10 minutes of CPU with X and/or emacs... and this
autonicing of X makes life unbearable on a machine that is 'a little'
busy (unbatching news or compiling).
I am perfectly capable of running nice all by myself. I am
even capable of running renice by myself.
So... why don't we make this a kernel 'option' if there's
anyone who actually wants the feature.
option AUTORENICE=10 # (minutes)
Dave.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|David Gilbert, PCI, Richmond Hill, Ontario. | Two things can only be |
|Mail: dgilbert@pci.on.ca | equal if and only if they |
|http://www.pci.on.ca/~dgilbert | are precisely opposite. |
---------------------------------------------------------GLO----------------