Subject: Re: procfs/kernfs "required"? [was Re: kernfs & libkvm]
To: None <bernie@metapro.metapro.DIALix.oz.au, tsarna@endicor.com>
From: Peter Seebach <seebs@solon.com>
List: current-users
Date: 01/13/1996 11:32:21 
What, you mean like plan 9 did?  That *is* the "Unix" approach.  Ditto
net stuff.  ioctl is a botch; you should open the ctl device and
write to it.

-s