Subject: Re: procfs/kernfs "required"? [was Re: kernel & libkvm... ]
To: None <>
From: None <Chris_G_Demetriou@NIAGARA.NECTAR.CS.CMU.EDU>
List: current-users
Date: 01/11/1996 21:04:29
> And that's a GENERIC kernel, whereas my SunOS kernel is trimmed of all
> unnecessary stuff (RFS, VFSSTATS, LWP, ASYNCHIO, tim, tirw, tcptli, bwtwo,
> cgthree, cgtwelve, gt aren't used).  My tuned NetBSD kernel is even smaller:
> -rwxr-xr-x  1 root  systaff  1003015 Dec  8 10:44 /
> text    data    bss     dec     hex
> 827360  98888   79008   1005256 f56c8
> tossing in /proc is negligible.

Without even ATTEMPTING to state the size of adding procfs, where do
you come off stating _that_?


even if it's one page, that's one page that i'd rather have unwired
and available for my applications...