Subject: Re: kernel & libkvm [was IIci success]
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason Downs <email@example.com>
Date: 01/11/1996 08:53:27
In message <9601110246.AA13076@vas.viewlogic.com>,
Open Carefully -- Contents Under Pressure writes:
>Neither one is truly necessary for system operation, although they DO appear
>to be performance treats, and they do allow for perusal via ls/stat/cat
>as opposed to needing special permissions thru the kernel (standard
>owner/group permissions seem to apply).
Programs that use the kvm library and such now should be using procfs
when appropiate. It is *beyond* silly to have things like kernfs, procfs,
and FIFOs optional. It is neither elegant nor impressive when a slight
kernel change can break ps(1).
People *should* be able to more or less track -current kernels without
having to track -current userland.
firstname.lastname@example.org --> teeny.org: Free Software for a Free Internet <--