Hubert Feyrer writes:
 > I assume you understood that the users (and that's what we act for here :-),
 > and with them their shells, don't have to include all those dir's
 > bin-subdirectories into ther $PATH, but only some common bin-dir
 > (/usr/local/bin), which contains only symlinks.

	Just a quick comment here: Some applications
will not work with this scheme. XEmacs, for example, looks at argv[0]
and PATH and uses this information to locate the lisp libraries. So,
in this case at least, it would be necessary to have a small
shell-script wrapper instead of a symlink.

	It would of course be possible to have a symlink to a wrapper
located in the package directory...

	//Raymond.