Subject: Re: xntpd
To: Jonathan Stone <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Michael Graff <email@example.com>
Date: 01/02/1996 02:16:18
>I'd personally like to see xntp in the NetBSD source tree. The sparc
>and pmax ports, for instance have lower latency and/or higher
>resolution gettimeofday() code than, say, SunOS or Ultrix; but last
>time I looked, the NetBSD kernel didn't have the adjtime() support
>that ntp used to prefer.
>Are there any copyright/license problems with incorporating xntp into
>the NetBSD source tree?
This would be a good thing, I think. However, there are issues with
putting lots of other programs into the tree. I mean, I think CVS and
SUP should be there as well, since those are used by quite a few
people who run NetBSD. :)
However, xntp, sup, and cvs would also make good packages us we had
good package installation tools. :)
Michael Graff <firstname.lastname@example.org> NetBSD is the way to go!
PGP key on a key-server near you! Netshade the world!