Subject: Re: LKM's for some file systems
To: None <mike.long@analog.com>
From: Peter Galbavy <peter@wonderland.org>
List: current-users
Date: 12/28/1995 19:03:50
> I think /lkm would be better, for two reasons:
> 
> 1) An LKM may be required to mount /usr (e.g., NFS).
> 2) LKMs must be installed in single-user mode, unless the INSECURE
>    kernel option is used.

I think /kernel (one things Slowlaris designers got right) is the place,
and then you may be able to have a special "bootfs" or whatever, and all
the kernel related stuff goes in /kernel, which may be more than just
lkm's.

Just a thought...

Regards,
-- 
Peter Galbavy                                           peter@wonderland.org
@ Home                                                 phone://44/973/499465
in Wonderland                              http://www.wonderland.org/~peter/
                               snail://UK/NW1_6LE/London/21_Harewood_Avenue/