> >Doesn't sysctl lock the kernel data structures to allow you to avoid
> >such things? If so, a sysctl based ps would be a win...
> Yeah, let's have fork() block on `ps'. :)

I always wonder what we have a procfs for, if it's not used by ps and we still
have to recompile libutil & ps when something changes.


Hubert

-- 
=============== Hubert Feyrer ============================================
      Weekdays: Rennerstr. 19, D-93053 Regensburg, Tel. 0941/943-2455
      Weekends: Bachstr. 40,   D-84066 Mallersdorf, Tel. 08772/6084
      Internet: hubert.feyrer@rz.uni-regensburg.de, IRC: hubertf
==========================================================================