> PS.  Dynalink is an IBMism for DLLS.  Maybe Ken's analogy to Hanna-Barbara
> is more correct.  Perhaps NetBSD DLLs should be called DynoMutts ;-)
> 
	Or maybe we should just call them Dynamic Librarys, or Dynamic
	Shared Objects like UNIX(tm) has been doing for years, LONG
	before Micro$haft/PC industry declared THEY invented the greatest
	thing since sliced bread, the DLL...

		-Rob