Subject: Re: Hesiod thoughts
To: None <>
From: Mike Long <>
List: current-users
Date: 10/23/1995 20:35:43
>Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 15:12:47 PDT
>From: (Data In~rte~vgri}ity EnginNO CARRIER)

>A sharex built on a hesiod system would run fine because the non-
>hesiod system would have a nop* as you surmised above.
>Build on a non-hesiod system would also run fine if a nop libhesiod
>were in place.

Unfortunately that doesn't help all of the shared binaries already out

>Yow.  This is all starting to make the nsswitch stuff look more appealing
>to the senses.

Mike Long <> 
VLSI Design Engineer         finger for PGP public key
Analog Devices, CPD Division          CCBF225E7D3F7ECB2C8F7ABB15D9BE7B
Norwood, MA 02062 USA                assert(*this!=opinionof(Analog));