>Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 15:12:47 PDT
>From: greywolf@defender.VAS.viewlogic.com (Data In~rte~vgri}ity EnginNO CARRIER)

>A sharex built on a hesiod system would run fine because the non-
>hesiod system would have a nop libhesiod.so.* as you surmised above.
>Build on a non-hesiod system would also run fine if a nop libhesiod
>were in place.

Unfortunately that doesn't help all of the shared binaries already out
there....

>Yow.  This is all starting to make the nsswitch stuff look more appealing
>to the senses.

Yes.
-- 
Mike Long <mike.long@analog.com>           http://www.shore.net/~mikel
VLSI Design Engineer         finger mikel@shore.net for PGP public key
Analog Devices, CPD Division          CCBF225E7D3F7ECB2C8F7ABB15D9BE7B
Norwood, MA 02062 USA                assert(*this!=opinionof(Analog));