Subject: Re: Hesiod thoughts
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Mike Long <email@example.com>
Date: 10/23/1995 20:35:43
>Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 15:12:47 PDT
>From: greywolf@defender.VAS.viewlogic.com (Data In~rte~vgri}ity EnginNO CARRIER)
>A sharex built on a hesiod system would run fine because the non-
>hesiod system would have a nop libhesiod.so.* as you surmised above.
>Build on a non-hesiod system would also run fine if a nop libhesiod
>were in place.
Unfortunately that doesn't help all of the shared binaries already out
>Yow. This is all starting to make the nsswitch stuff look more appealing
>to the senses.
Mike Long <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.shore.net/~mikel
VLSI Design Engineer finger email@example.com for PGP public key
Analog Devices, CPD Division CCBF225E7D3F7ECB2C8F7ABB15D9BE7B
Norwood, MA 02062 USA assert(*this!=opinionof(Analog));