Subject: Re: BIND/Hesiod
To: John C. Hayward <johnh@david.wheaton.edu>
From: Luke Mewburn <lukem@telstra.com.au>
List: current-users
Date: 09/05/1995 13:07:51
> On Fri, 1 Sep 1995, J.T. Conklin wrote:
> > > These last 3 days I've been working on a generic nsswitch implementation.
> > > The code uses /var/run/nsswitch.db, which is built by ns_mkdb from
> > > /etc/nsswitch.conf.
> >
> > Yow! Sounds exciting. Quite honestly, this is what I had hoped for when
> > this discussion (nsswitch vs. +) broke out last month.
> >
> > The nsswitch feature set you've selected sounds great. Have you done
> > any work with the libc internals so that it's easy to drop in another
> > database access method (like Hesiod)? That would make it both a ease
> > of use and a technical win over the current scheme.
> >
> > --jtc
> I somehow missed the nsswitch vs + discussion last month. With the
> nsswitch is it possible to have a configuration file which specifies for
> password entry to first try localfiles, then if that fails try bind, then
> if that fails try YP? Or are you only able to specify one method per
> kind of thing to lookup?
You can do what you want. Here is an example.
passwd: file dns nis
BTW, the code is about to be made "alpha release" for others to
examine and critique.
--
Luke Mewburn <luke.mewburn@itg.telstra.com.au>
Don't steal. The Government (and the Banks) hate competition. - (anon)