Subject: Re: Comparison of OS for PC's
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Mike Long <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/25/1995 09:44:46
>Date: Fri, 25 Aug 1995 01:49:12 -0700
>From: Robert Dobbs <email@example.com>
>so qualitatively, what would you say that these benchmarks show that
>netbsd lacks? What I picked up was that the page allocation scheme was
>perhaps not the best in the world and that netbsd seemed to overrun the
If you're that concerned with data cache performance, try madvise(2).
The main thing I noticed was the performance hit NetBSD takes because
of the unintegrated buffer cache.
Mike Long <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.shore.net/~mikel
VLSI Design Engineer finger email@example.com for PGP public key
Analog Devices, CPD Division CCBF225E7D3F7ECB2C8F7ABB15D9BE7B
Norwood, MA 02062 USA assert(*this!=opinionof(Analog));