Subject: Re: upgrade gcc to 2.7?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Niklas Hallqvist <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/03/1995 23:48:26
[ a rather harsh-toned argument from me deleted ]
No I am not an idiot contrary to popular belief; when I say it does not
compile, I mean that the resulting binary core-dumps even after I fix
all of the for loop index variables. I know that this is a compiler bug,
because the code compiles and runs with 2.6.2 after my fixes...
Have you compiled a working version on groff on the sparc with 2.7.0?
I want to apologize for my tone, it was not clear that you knew about
the for-scope change to me. I have seen several complaints on this
very topic and I was getting tired of explining it. Peace? I don't
state GCC 2.7.0 is bug-free, no more than any other piece of
non-trivial software. However, groff could still be at fault, even
though 2.6.2-compiled versions worked. Sometimes application bugs
doesn't harm until codegen strategies are
changed... (e.g. destructions of temporaries, used before initialized
vars etc.) But I do prefer to believe it is a GCC bug, in cases like
this, just like you do.
Anyway, I really want to apologize for my tone.
PS No I haven't ever compiled groff on a sparc... however several of
the G++ maintainers do work on sparcs, and they do test groff
before a release. Are you using special flags?
Niklas Hallqvist Phone: +46-(0)31-40 75 00
Applitron Datasystem Fax: +46-(0)31-83 39 50
Molndalsvagen 95 Email: email@example.com
S-412 63 GOTEBORG WWW: Here