Subject: Re: csh vs. tcsh
To: Eric S. Hvozda <email@example.com>
From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/31/1995 16:22:51
> On Sun, 30 Jul 1995 19:09:06 +0200 (MET DST) Blaz Zupan wrote:
> > Looking at tcsh I see it is more advanced then the original
> > NetBSD csh. I wonder why we don't replace csh with tcsh.
> > Is it historical reasons? Copyright problems? Or are there
> > any features in csh that are not present in tcsh?
> One can always get tcsh and compile and install it themselves,
> why bloat the source tree?
Let's change the question: Why not include tcsh in the default
distribuition ? Some may not like tcsh, but other may. It's
something like choosing between sh, bash, sh5 and ksh, I think. :)
Joao Carlos Mendes Luis email@example.com
+55 21 290-4698 ( Job ) firstname.lastname@example.org
Network Manager UFRJ/COPPE/CISI
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro