Subject: Re: CVS & LFS
To: None <andrew@wipux2.wifo.uni-mannheim.de>
From: Charles M. Hannum <mycroft@ai.mit.edu>
List: current-users
Date: 06/08/1995 13:07:40 
LFS is well known to not be reliable.  I've fixed a few bugs in it,
but without a fsck(8) analog for it and some serious work to make it
actually perform better, it's not terribly useful.