Subject: Re: compressed virtual memory
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Ernst J. du Toit <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/03/1995 19:55:47
Don Youdale wrote:
> Compressed RAM is not a new idea. It has been available on Macs for quite some time.
> The problem is, how do you make it compatible with all software. Many lower level
> drivers need redundant compression code as they do not use common memory routines.
> Obviously this problem is far more prevalent on Intel platforms than most others.
> My question is, is memory compression worth the work. Memory, like disk is so
> cheap now. Out of memory? Just buy more.
While I'm reaching over my keyboard for my coned hat...
I recall the original proposal was for compressed virtual memory, that to
me translates to disk space - unless the box is diskless on a network.
If that is the case then I'm all for it, especially for diskless boxes
since it 'should' have a good impact in the network traffic a diskless X
I've got a few classrooms here I'd LOVE to see X diskless, instead of that
other non UNIX stuff 8-)
Ernst J. du Toit (TED5) Internet: email@example.com
School of Electrical Engineering BELTEL : 175250 / Amateur Radio: ZR1ABB
Cape Technikon Voice: +27 21 460 3911 / Fax: +27 21 45 4161
South Africa /* Hackers do it with bytes and nybbles ! */