Subject: Re: PCVT/virtual consoles
To: None <D.K.Brownlee@city.ac.uk>
From: Charles M. Hannum <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/08/1995 07:38:55
Personally I'd like multiple text consoles on the vt320 on one
of my sparcs - it would be nice if the virtual terminals support
was architecture independant.
Great idea! I suggest you write a user-level application to do it!
Getting the multiple X server support to be architecture independant
I would consider another (worthwhile) issue, but shouldn't basic pcvt
support be generalised first?
No offense intended to Hellmuth, but pcvt is *not* well enough
abstracted or written that I want to standardize on it. It's also
pretty clear to me that it's not the right solution to the problem.