Subject: Re: PCVT/virtual consoles
To: Matthieu Herrb <matthieu@laas.fr>
From: David Brownlee <D.K.Brownlee@city.ac.uk>
List: current-users
Date: 05/08/1995 11:45:23
	I think there are two issue here - multiple text consoles, and
	multiple X servers.

	Personally I'd like multiple text consoles on the vt320 on one
	of my sparcs - it would be nice if the virtual terminals support
	was architecture independant.

	Getting the multiple X server support to be architecture independant
	I would consider another (worthwhile) issue, but shouldn't basic pcvt
	support be generalised first?

	Just my 2p worth ( ~ 3c :)

			David


  D.K.Brownlee@city.ac.uk (MIME)    (+44) 171 477 8186    abs@Monochrome 
         (>=-=<)   Network Analyst  {post,host}master  (>=-=<)
 Computing Services, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB.
        .-----------.                      .-------------------------.
  .----'  Monochrome `--------------------'  biggest UK internet BBS `---.
 /  telnet mono.city.ac.uk  .--------.  email to monoadm@mono.city.ac.uk  \
 `-------------------------'          `-----------------------------------'