Subject: Re: PCVT/virtual consoles
To: Matthieu Herrb <matthieu@laas.fr>
From: David Brownlee <D.K.Brownlee@city.ac.uk>
List: current-users
Date: 05/08/1995 11:45:23
I think there are two issue here - multiple text consoles, and
multiple X servers.
Personally I'd like multiple text consoles on the vt320 on one
of my sparcs - it would be nice if the virtual terminals support
was architecture independant.
Getting the multiple X server support to be architecture independant
I would consider another (worthwhile) issue, but shouldn't basic pcvt
support be generalised first?
Just my 2p worth ( ~ 3c :)
David
D.K.Brownlee@city.ac.uk (MIME) (+44) 171 477 8186 abs@Monochrome
(>=-=<) Network Analyst {post,host}master (>=-=<)
Computing Services, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB.
.-----------. .-------------------------.
.----' Monochrome `--------------------' biggest UK internet BBS `---.
/ telnet mono.city.ac.uk .--------. email to monoadm@mono.city.ac.uk \
`-------------------------' `-----------------------------------'