Hi, I was just wondering if anyone got libg++-2.6.2 to compile on a
NetBSD1.0A box? I'm running NetBSD1.0A on an Amiga.
I first built gcc-2.6.3 which went without any problems, I installed
the following patch to it: (this was posted here earlier)


----This was posted on one of the NetBSD lists recently---

 Tue, 14 Mar 1995, Olaf Seibert wrote:

> I installed gcc 2.6.3 from the binary package at ftp.netbsd.org,
> and with g++ I'm having trouble with template functions being
> multiply defined.
> 
> /var/tmp/cc0004021.o: Definition of symbol `_split__t10DoubleList1Zi' (multiply defined)
> /var/tmp/cc0004022.o: Definition of symbol `_split__t10DoubleList1Zi' (multiply defined)

I extracted the sources out of your example and tried with my 
slightly-patched version of gcc-2.6.3.  I had no problems.  (It's this 
same patch that allows gcc-2.6.3 to successfully compile libg++-2.6.2 on 
NetBSD.)  Perhaps it could be included in the binary package?

[forwarded message follows]

This patch fixes the multiply defined template functions bug
which was introduced in 2.6.1.

Jason

*** ../../gcc-2.6.3/cp/pt.c     Mon Nov 14 23:34:29 1994
--- pt.c        Mon Dec 12 21:10:06 1994
***************
*** 2302,2307 ****
--- 2302,2311 ----
        else if (! flag_implicit_templates)
        DECIDE (0);
  
+       if (i->interface == 1)
+       /* OK, it was an implicit instantiation.  */
+       TREE_PUBLIC (t) = 0;
+ 
        /* If it's a method, let the class type decide it.
         @@ What if the method template is in a separate file?
         Maybe both file contexts should be taken into account?

Scott Reynolds

----End of Patch----


The followin are the errors I get when I did make -k

-----Eroor Messages------

cd src; make all ...
gcc -c -g -nostdinc++ -I. -I../../libio -I. -I./../../libio -I./../src
Fix.cc
Fix.cc: In function `static struct Fix::Rep * Fix::multiply(const
struct Fix::Rep *, const struct Fix::Rep *, struct Fix::Rep * = 0)':
Fix.cc:301: call of overloaded constructor `Fix(unsigned int)' is
ambiguous
./Fix.h:232: candidates are: Fix::Fix(const Fix &)
./Fix.h:218:                 Fix::Fix(int)
./Fix.h:226:                 Fix::Fix(double)
Fix.cc:301: in base initialization for class `Fix'
Fix.cc:301: call of overloaded constructor `Fix(unsigned int)' is
ambiguous
./Fix.h:232: candidates are: Fix::Fix(const Fix &)
./Fix.h:218:                 Fix::Fix(int)
./Fix.h:226:                 Fix::Fix(double)
Fix.cc:301: in base initialization for class `Fix'
Fix.cc: In function `static struct Fix::Rep * Fix::divide(const struct
Fix::Rep *, const struct Fix::Rep *, struct Fix::Rep * = 0, struct
Fix::Rep * = 0)':
Fix.cc:371: call of overloaded constructor `Fix(unsigned int)' is
ambiguous
./Fix.h:232: candidates are: Fix::Fix(const Fix &)
./Fix.h:218:                 Fix::Fix(int)
./Fix.h:226:                 Fix::Fix(double)
Fix.cc:371: in base initialization for class `Fix'
Fix.cc:386: call of overloaded constructor `Fix(unsigned int)' is
ambiguous
./Fix.h:232: candidates are: Fix::Fix(const Fix &)
./Fix.h:218:                 Fix::Fix(int)
./Fix.h:226:                 Fix::Fix(double)
Fix.cc:386: in base initialization for class `Fix'
*** Error code 1 (continuing)
`all' not remade because of errors.
cd tests; make all ...
cd gperf; make all ...
cd src ; make ... all
gcc -o gperf new.o options.o iterator.o main.o gen-perf.o key-list.o
list-node.o hash-table.o bool-array.o read-line.o std-err.o version.o
-L./../../ -lg++
options.cc:204: Undefined symbol `___6GetOptiPPcPCc' referenced from
text segment
options.cc:211: Undefined symbol `___cl__6GetOpt' referenced from text
segment
hash-table.cc:73: Undefined symbol `_hashpjw__FPCc' referenced from
text segment
*** Error code 1 (continuing)
`all' not remade because of errors.

----End of Errors----


Does anyone have any hints about what I should do?


Thanks.

Arthur.

__
Arthur Hoffmann					hoffmann@it.ntu.edu.au