In message <199504111635.MAA07513@Collatz.McRCIM.McGill.EDU>, der Mouse writes:
> 
[Nuked]
> 
> How about the following as a fat binary?  (Obviously the btoa data
> sections are not for real. :-)
> 
> #! /bin/sh
> fn=/tmp/$$.exec
> case `arch` in
> 	sun4)	atob << \EOF
[Nuked]


I hope that ':-)' was intended for the idea.  What about the /bin/sh, arch,
and atob binaries?  The above will only work if those binaries are architec.
independant.  And if they are, why not others?

IMHO: fat binaries are *UGLY*.

--Toby.
*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*
| Tobias Weingartner | Email: weingart@BrandonU.Ca | Need a Unix sys-admin?  |
| Box 27, Beulah, MB |-----------------------------| Send E-Mail for resume, |
| R0M 0B0, Canada    | Unix Guru, Admin, Sys-Prgmr | and other details...    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|      %SYSTEM-F-ANARCHISM, The operating system has been overthrown         |
*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*