Subject: Re: Netscape.
To: John F. Woods <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Herb Peyerl <email@example.com>
Date: 03/10/1995 10:59:14
"John F. Woods" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> A good point, but it really makes things worse: you're now expecting
> Netscape to buy not just one "cheap" NetBSD development machine, but
> several (what, ten?), some of which will be hard to come by (bought
Now someone is going to volunteer to make each of the ports capable of
cross-compiling kernels and applications for each of the other ports...
> Do each of the non-x86 NetBSDs support an executable for some commercial
> UNIX system?
COMPAT_HPUX needs attention as it's never really been
massaged to fit into the NetBSD framework.
I'm not sure what the issues are surrounding converting the
hp300 port (the port that I use most) to 8k pagesize
so it can run binaries from the other 68k ports...
(Note: I'm not volunteering to do any of the above).