Subject: Re: More defines (fwd)
To: thecure <mda@lame.mame.mu.oz.au>
From: Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com <michaelv@HeadCandy.com>
List: current-users
Date: 03/04/1995 10:07:31
>Are there any nasty side effects to DUMMY_NOPS?
>-john
I've been using DUMMY_NOPS in every machine I run NetBSD on, for well
over a year.
Any machine with fairly decent/current hardware will not need
DUMMY_NOPS. Realistically, you should only need DUMMY_NOPS for really
old or really poorly designed slow hardware.
YMMV.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@HeadCandy.com
--< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >--
NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac, Amiga, HP300, Sun3, Sun4, PC532,
DEC pmax (MIPS R2k/3k), DEC/AXP (Alpha)
NetBSD ports in progress: VAX and others...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------