Subject: Re: rdist vs. sup
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@vix.com>
From: Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com <michaelv@HeadCandy.com>
List: current-users
Date: 03/02/1995 21:13:19
>A sixteen bit checksum isn't big enough to make this *really*
>unlikely. A 32-bit checksum is quite a lot better. Running MD5 over
>the message would probably be better still, but who has time? I
>notice failures about once every two weeks. I'd like it if sup could
>catch those.
I'd like it if TCP could catch these...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@HeadCandy.com
--< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >--
NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac, Amiga, HP300, Sun3, Sun4, PC532,
DEC pmax (MIPS R2k/3k), DEC/AXP (Alpha)
NetBSD ports in progress: VAX and others...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------