Subject: Re: rdist vs. sup
To: Ted Lemon <>
From: Michael L. VanLoon -- <>
List: current-users
Date: 03/02/1995 21:13:19
>A sixteen bit checksum isn't big enough to make this *really*
>unlikely.  A 32-bit checksum is quite a lot better.  Running MD5 over
>the message would probably be better still, but who has time?  I
>notice failures about once every two weeks.  I'd like it if sup could
>catch those.

I'd like it if TCP could catch these...

  Michael L. VanLoon                       
       --<  Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x  >--
     NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac, Amiga, HP300, Sun3, Sun4, PC532,
                           DEC pmax (MIPS R2k/3k), DEC/AXP (Alpha)
     NetBSD ports in progress: VAX and others...