Subject: Re: Latest CERT advisory on telnet vs. Kerberos
To: Mike Long <mike.long@analog.com>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@kuma.web.net>
List: current-users
Date: 02/22/1995 14:20:59
[ On Wed, February 22, 1995 at 11:17:11 (EST), Mike Long wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Latest CERT advisory on telnet vs. Kerberos
>
> Now that we (U.S. users) have /usr/src/domestic, is it possible that
> an unmangled version of telnet et. al. will show up there?

I just don't get it....  Why is it called "domestic"?

Also, why strip out the enabling hooks in an application?  There's no
actual encryption technology encoded in there....

-- 
						Greg A. Woods

+1 416 443-1734			VE3TCP		robohack!woods
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; UniForum Canada <woods@uniforum.ca>