Subject: Re: Packages for NetBSD (Was: Why are there two 4.4BSD dev. groups)
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Timothy Newsham <email@example.com>
Date: 01/11/1995 10:44:10
> I've personally torn both ways on this issue. On the one hand, I'd
> really like perl to be available to encourage package authors to write
> good quality high functionality pre/post installation scripts. On the
> other, I'd really rather the base NetBSD distribution were a whole lot
> smaller than it currently is.
even the docs and the compiler are installed as seperate modules
above and beyond 'base'. Those are definitely a *hell of a lot*
more important than perl.
Perl can be provided as an add-on.
> Me: Ronald Khoo Food: Roti Chanai Drink: Tea, weak, milky without sugar
> In Malaysia: firstname.lastname@example.org +60 3 241 5232 Computer Protocol Malaysia
> In England: email@example.com +44 181 371 1000 Demon Internet Services