Subject: Why Perl [is | is not] needed (Was: Package discussion.)
To: Ted Lemon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Michael Graff <email@example.com>
Date: 01/09/1995 21:00:53
>When I talk about install scripts, I'm not talking about the package
>stuff - I suspect that that does everything I want. What I'm talking
>about is the script(s) that you run to configure your system
>initially. This is a slightly (but significantly) different problem
>than the one the package system solves.
Will Perl be of any use to partition the drives for install, for
example? I don't think the static executable will fix on one floppy,
at least not with the other tools needed to beat a drive into
If it can't fit on the first few disks you plug into a fresh machine,
make it a package. If it can, I'm all for Perl being there.
Perhaps it would be better to write a few _custom_ install programs
(not scripts, but programs) which can extract the information from the
system, drives, user, diety, and install the system that way.
Michael Graff <firstname.lastname@example.org> NetBSD is the way to go!
PGP key on a key-server near you! Rayshade the world!