Subject: Re: union fs changes
To: None <jsp@sequent.com>
From: Kenneth Stailey <kstailey@leidecker.gsfc.nasa.gov>
List: current-users
Date: 12/30/1994 15:32:21 
>it seems to be that the name undelete is ok.  would you
>have both a file available for undeletion, and a whiteout
>in existence at the same time?

You could have successive undelete(2) calls.  First one zaps the
whiteout, the second restores the file.