Subject: Re: The obvious inherent superiority of SVR4 device naming...
To: Don Lewis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Per Fogelstrom <email@example.com>
Date: 12/23/1994 12:10:49
> On Dec 21, 10:11pm, der Mouse wrote:
> } Subject: Re: The obvious inherent superiority of SVR4 device naming...
> } I suppose it's a matter of taste. I rather like having disk numbers
> } (the number after "sd") assigned from zero upwards as the kernel scans
> } the available controllers and target IDs.
> I worry about automagic stuff like that. What happens if one of my
> disks with a low ID dies and the system mounts a data partition as
If it does, it mus be considered as a bug. Swaping on a partition tagged
as anything else than "swap" should be prohibited. At least when mounting