Subject: Re: future NetBSD cpp predefines...
To: Ted Lemon <email@example.com>
From: Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@LAGAVULIN.PDL.CS.CMU.EDU>
Date: 12/22/1994 01:30:30
> I think that the right implementation is that when gcc is built, it
> includes a well-known header file which defines these values.
no, this isn't even _close_ to right.
what happens when 1.0A becomes 1.0B? or somebody decides to start
tracking -current (1.0A)?
they need to recompile their compiler? no, i think that's quite
silly, _especially_ since there already exists a way for them to find
out the NetBSD version number, as a CPP define.
> > #define __ALPHA__
> Well, 1.0 is already released, so 1.0a can't be 1.0 alpha. Maybe
> it's 1.1 alpha... However, I think it's really 1.0.1. Maybe
> somebody who knows can tell us... :')
A means A.
B means B.
1.0A follows 1.0.
1.0B follows 1.0A.
there is no magic word associated with the letters. (c.f. the Ultrix
version numbering scheme.)