Subject: Re: Formal getty replacement yet?
To: VaX#n8 <>
From: Greg A. Woods <>
List: current-users
Date: 12/21/1994 10:24:13
[ On Tue, December 20, 1994 at 18:47:02 (-0600), VaX#n8 wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Formal getty replacement yet?
> awry and who to complain to, if anyone).  After all, ``Unix doesn't try to stop
> you from doing stupid things, because then it would stop you from doing very
> clever things'' or somesuch.

Exactly!  ;-)

> I wouldn't mind seeing more drivers in the kernel.
> Just don't take out the high-performance, stable (simple?) drivers in favor of
> complicated experimental ones.

That's what I'm "arguing" for....

> Too bad holding a CVS src tree AND a working src tree takes so much disk. :(

Ah, but disk is cheap these days!  Why I remember.....

						Greg A. Woods

+1 416 443-1734			VE3TCP		robohack!woods
Planix, Inc. <>; UniForum Canada <>