Subject: Re: Formal getty replacement yet?
To: VaX#n8 <email@example.com>
From: Greg A. Woods <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/21/1994 10:24:13
[ On Tue, December 20, 1994 at 18:47:02 (-0600), VaX#n8 wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Formal getty replacement yet?
> awry and who to complain to, if anyone). After all, ``Unix doesn't try to stop
> you from doing stupid things, because then it would stop you from doing very
> clever things'' or somesuch.
> I wouldn't mind seeing more drivers in the kernel.
> Just don't take out the high-performance, stable (simple?) drivers in favor of
> complicated experimental ones.
That's what I'm "arguing" for....
> Too bad holding a CVS src tree AND a working src tree takes so much disk. :(
Ah, but disk is cheap these days! Why I remember.....
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 443-1734 VE3TCP robohack!woods
Planix, Inc. <email@example.com>; UniForum Canada <firstname.lastname@example.org>