Subject: Re: Formal getty replacement yet? To: J.T. Conklin <firstname.lastname@example.org> From: Martin Husemann <email@example.com> List: current-users Date: 12/20/1994 18:24:16
> I didn't think changing NetBSD's getty into some sort of "uugetty" was
> even under consideration.
Anybody who needs a kind of "uugetty" now: ask archie for mgetty.
Newer versions compile and work out of the box on NetBSD-1.0 and -current.