Subject: Re: Formal getty replacement yet?
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: D'Arcy J.M. Cain <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/18/1994 20:34:00
>From message <199412182218.OAA23543@netcom16.netcom.com>:
: > Has anybody come up with a formal replacement for that pathetic
: > excuse for a getty that is in NetBSD? It doesn't even respect
: > UUCP's lock files!!! I know there are many replacements out there
Well it is getty after all, not uugetty. It isn't supposed to do
: > but has any thought been given to selecting one and making it
: > NetBSD "standard"?
I use mgetty. I haven't had any problem with that.
: I thought we wanted separate /dev/ttyXX and /dev/cuaXX devices
That certainly gets my vote.
D'Arcy J.M. Cain (email@example.com) |
Planix, Inc. | Democracy is three wolves and a
Toronto, Ontario, Canada | sheep voting on what's for dinner.
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) |