Subject: Re: NeXT?
To: Rolf Grossmann <email@example.com>
From: Dave McGuire <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/03/1994 17:15:06
On November 3, you wrote:
> Hey, I never expected anyone to be interested in this, as NeXTStep already
> is a BSD flavour and _in my view_ the look and feel of NeXTStep is much
> better than X11 (and if you still need X11 you can get it anyway).
But in the opinion of many, there are a lot of things in the BSD
side of NeXTStep that are broken, and the underlying MACH is slow as
molasses. I had a big conversation about this last night with a
friend of mine who is a NeXTgod (he got me into NeXTs, as a mattter of
fact) and we did agree that people get NeXTs for the software, not the
performance; but there may be some people wanting to use a 4.4-ish
system with X on their [admittedly rather nice] black NeXT hardware.
I would agree on the "look-and-feel" thing but remember that with
the right window managers and toolkits, you can make X look and feel
like ANYTHING you want. Taken straight from some official X
consortium document long ago, not quite verbatim but close:
The X window system implements a windowing mechanism, not policy.
But more to the point...I know several people who would like to see
a NeXT port of NetBSD. In my opinion, the idea has merit.
Digital Express Group, Incorporated