Subject: Re: gcc-ansi -pedantic and long long on NetBSD
To: None <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: T. William Wells <bill@twwells.com>
List: current-users
Date: 11/01/1994 22:40:42
In article <199411011803.KAA09349@rurapenthe.ipd.wellsfargo.com>,
Ted Lemon <mellon@ipd.wellsfargo.com> wrote:
: > There was a right way to define the extended long type. GNU's pomposity
: > is no excuse for their incompetance.
:
: ...and that is?
I guess you weren't reading, as this has been answered at least
three times in this discussion.