Subject: Re: gcc-ansi -pedantic and long long on NetBSD
To: None <>
From: T. William Wells <>
List: current-users
Date: 11/01/1994 22:40:42
In article <>,
Ted Lemon  <> wrote:
: > There was a right way to define the extended long type.  GNU's pomposity
: > is no excuse for their incompetance.
: ...and that is?

I guess you weren't reading, as this has been answered at least
three times in this discussion.