Subject: Re: gcc-ansi -pedantic and long long on NetBSD
To: None <email@example.com>
From: John F. Woods <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/01/1994 09:55:06
Someone left nameless quoted:
> As the GCC info file states: the
> -pedantic option is only there to satisfy pedants (and we wouldn't like to
> be called *that*, would we? :-)
"No, we'd rather be called incompetant parochial feebs who want to lock
people into our proprietary ill-conceived language extensions in order to
enhance the authority of the Free Software Foundation."
There was a right way to define the extended long type. GNU's pomposity
is no excuse for their incompetance.