Subject: Re: various questions (performance,bootblocks,libgcc)
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Charles M. Hannum <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/20/1994 08:31:39
1. Can current bootblocks boot kernel from level 1 ffs ?
This has been covered on current-users before. Yes, they can and do.
(I'm not going to convert my *extremely* stable FS's while seeing
fs-related panic reports on mailing lists, I still use 0.9 bootblocks)
1) That has very little to do with whether you're using the old or new
file system format.
2) There is a temporary change in the current sources that alleviates
those symptoms. I'm working on a `correct' fix, but it's a pain.
3) `No pain, no gain.'
2. I noticed that libgcc.a for NetBSD's gcc is much smaller than
libgcc.a installed by stock gcc-2.6.0. (17KB vs 120KB).
The default GCC build includes some debugging info in libgcc.a that's
not really useful. Also, 2.6 has a few new functions in there.
libgcc.a be used instead of original libgcc.a when linking object files
generated by gcc-2.6.0 ?
`See above.' Note that if you use 2.6.0 to compile NetBSD, you better
be sure that any bugs you report are not really compiler bugs, or you
will waste a lot of people's time!