Subject: Re: 1.0A Repeated "panic: ffs_alloccg" Any ideas?
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Andrew Herbert <email@example.com>
Date: 10/20/1994 13:36:41
firstname.lastname@example.org (Greg A. Woods) writes:
>So, does anyone know if QUOTAS are reliable in the newer -current now?
QUOTAs have been working well for me on a couple of busy i486 machines
running 1.0A kernels built from sources of about a month ago. This should
mean that the current 1.0 beta code will also handle ufs quotas reliably.
Note that it is important to update your quota-ed (urgh) filesystems to use
4.4BSD-style inodes, a la fsck -c2. Otherwise, quotacheck will be pretty
unhappy (it doesn't understand the old 16 bit uid/gid format).