Subject: Re: bad programming (was: Is there a new tcsh source)
To: Szabolcs Szigeti (PinkPanther) <email@example.com>
From: Ken Hornstein <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/10/1994 15:42:45
>No. Bad programming means writing things like:
>And giving the user the choise of adding -DSUCKER_SYSTEM to CFLAGS. Or better
>yet, providing an autoconfiguration utility (look at emacs or clisp, wonderful
Thanks, that's what I really meant.
I'd just like to say that having your own prototypes for system calls/library
functions is one of my pet peeves; I recently had to port our company's
software to OSF/1, and (like on most modern operating systems) things like
getopt were prototyped as:
extern int getopt __((int, char * const , const char *));
and malloc was:
extern void *malloc __((size_t ));
(sys_errlist was char *, unlike NetBSD's const char *const).
And one particular programmer had "char *malloc()" in nearly every .c file,
and I had to fix them all :-(
So I rapidly grew to hate people who put their own prototypes in their source
code :-). This was re-affirmed by porting stuff to NetBSD.
I didn't mean to insult anyone; perhaps my remarks were a bit hasty. I still
believe that having your own prototypes for system functions is a generally
bad idea, but there are no doubt plenty of exceptions to this.