Subject: Re: cksum listing also?
To: None <cgd@postgres.berkeley.edu>
From: None <cagney@highland.oz.au>
List: current-users
Date: 05/18/1994 10:29:46
Hi,
I write:
> > Could there be generated (as part of the weekly processing) a set
> > of files each containing a cksum listing of a major part of the NetBSD -
> > current source tree.
Any you respond:
> I see several problems with this:
> (1) if you generate the cksums weekly, then, on all the other
> days of the week, some files will look bogus. i don't
> like this -- it defeats the purpose of doing the cksum
> to begin with.
Very true. I chose weekly so that:
o They would match the source.tar files which I think are
created each week.
o Would keep the load down (daily as you noted would kill the
machine)
To re-construct todays source tree both the most recent cksum listings and
the following few days `daily CVS update output' would be needed.
What about making the cksum outputs available weekly and attach to them a
README file containing something like:
``These weekly cksum(1) listings are provided as is. Trying
to maintain a NetBSD-current source tree using this information
is not supported.
It is assumed that people tracking the NetBSD-current source tree
are able to make IP level connections to the NetBSD-current archive
and can run sup(1).
It is also assumed that people wishing to obtain individual files
from the NetBSD-current source tree have some form of ftp access to
the archive site.
If you do not have access to sup(1) then these cksum listings may
be helpfull (but remember `they are not supported')
To check your NetBSD source tree against NetBSD-current you will
need both these cksum files _and_ any `daily CVS update output'
posted since the files were last generated. Even then, because of
network delays, you may find that you are playing a `catch up game'
with the NetBSD-current sources.''
Re-phrase it (make it stronger) if you want, I think, however, it gets most of
the points across.
regards Andrew
PS: Cksum's on the `daily CVS update output' would be nice but I should
think that is pushing things too far :-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------