In message <Cn1720.90A@endicor.com>, Ty Sarna writes:

>In article <199403211508.HAA12959@sun-lamp.cs.berkeley.edu> Adam Glass <glass@
>sun-lamp.cs.berkeley.edu> writes:
>> no one has offered one.  This is not a shot on sight kind of thing at
>
>I recall someone (Terry??) working on one, but I haven't heard anything
>about it for a very long time. Anyone remember who it was or know the
>current status?

while I would agree that having an SVR4 compliant strems interface in the 
kernel would be nice from a "code reusablility" standpoint, the performance
loose might be unacceptable (scheduling streams is well, not fast, imho)

I think a better approach would be to put the "X kernel" in netbsd.  We could
get some huge performance wins on tcp/ip as well as other protocols. and
still get some of the benefits of "modules".  I think mod-loadable x kernel
modules would be a good thing(tm).

-brad

------------------------------------------------------------------------------