> (1) have you considered using a table to do this?  it'd make the code
> 	a lot prettier.

I have, and that was how the original code was, but I figured that the
lookup time on a table wasn't worth it.  Although, I have come up with 
another way of doing it now, maybe I will try that tonight.


> (2) all of these log() calls are just going to increase the number of silo
> 	overflows you get -- i've found that one log() generally
> 	causes a cascade of overflows, on a high-speed line...

Good point, I will remove that when I change the code tonight as well.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------