> I noticed that CVS isn't part of the NetBSD source tree. Since CVS is
> used extensively in the NetBSD project, and since RCS is already
> included, would it not make sense to include CVS also?

few people use RCS, fewer would use CVS.  the source for it is pretty
large, and it compiles "out of the box" under NetBSD-current, last
time i checked.

i don't think that having it in the source tree would be worth the
extra space it would cost most people.


chris

------------------------------------------------------------------------------