Subject: Re: bootblocks, VCs, gcc
To: Dirk Steinberg <steinber@vercingetorix.ert.rwth-aachen.de>
From: S|ren Schmidt <sos@login.dkuug.dk>
List: current-users
Date: 02/03/1994 09:11:42
>
> >>>>> "davidb" == davidb <davidb@melb.cpr.itg.telecom.com.au> writes:
>
> >> BTW: Is there any good reason why NetBSD does *not* adopt VC's
> >> (virtual consoles)? They are indispensable when working without
> >> X, i.e. on a laptop. Linux even offers mouse-based
> >> cut-and-paste between VC's ala xterm. Nice. Does syscons or
> >> pcvt work with NetBSD-current and XFree-2.0?
>
> davidb> I'm not in a position to comment on things like syscons,
> davidb> but what's the problem with pccons on a laptop? Have you
> davidb> ever looked at `window`? It works great for me.
>
> davidb> My login on my laptop is set to invoke it if I log in via
> davidb> the console. Window even supports cut-and-paste, although
> davidb> not with a mouse.
>
> davidb> - David B.
>
> I don't want to start the debate of kernel vs. user space VC's again,
> but there are some definite advantages for a kernel space
> implementation. I'm also aware of screen-3.5.2, but that's not what
> I'm looking for.
>
> I know there exist syscons and pcvt and codrv for *BSD, but my
> question is why none of them is *standard* with NetBSD.
>
> Dirk
I can't answer that for you, but being the developer of syscons
I hereby offer the "beast" to the NetBSD group, including the
work of getting it integrated (It allready is unofficially :-)
PS: I would like to have "cut & paste" in syscons as well,
anybody having good ideas of how the should work (on the user
level) ??
Soeren Schmidt
sos@login.dkuug.dk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------