Subject: Graphics boards
To: None <amiga@NetBSD.ORG>
From: H}kan Th|rngren <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/18/1995 15:51:30
Sorry to bug in, but I need some advice on which graphics board I should
get for NetBSD. I have used NetBSD in the past, but went back to AmigaDOS
due to the boring X-display on 14" ECS.
I can't stand AmigaDOS any longer so I have to switch again.
I feel that I can get a decent 17" monitor, it can be used long after my
A3000 is gone, but what graphics board should I get?
I have asked this before and got the impression that Picasso II board
was what I should get. Unfortunately, they are as other Amiga
graphics boards very high priced. I can afford it, but I don't think
they are woth it (5000kr ~ USD670 ~ DEM1000), so I have tried to
locate a used graphics board, with very little success.
I have a guy who wants to sell me a Retina Z2, but I don't know how good
I want a non-interlaced display of 1152x950 (or whatever the SUN-resolution
is), 256 colours and ~70Hz update freq or better.
>From what I understand, there are 4 alternatives:
1. Picasso II (or Spectrum or Piccolo) using a Cirrus chip.
They fit into my specification?
2. Retina Z2. The most likely board to be found on the second hand market.
Can it do 1152x900 non-interlaced? How is it compared to a Cirrus
board? Is it slow? (There must be a reason why they made Retina Z3)
3. Retina Z3. 1280x1024 non-interlaced and faster than Cirrus boards?
4. A PC-graphics board. Can they be fit into the A3000 and used with NetBSD?
All opinions are very welcome. I do want a *good* graphics board that
meets my needs and works with NetBSD. It also be one of the most common
boards used by NetBSDers so that I am not left out in the cold in the future.
It should also be fast enough for normal use. I don't know if this is a
problem for any of the graphics boards above?
Please enlighten me.
Use MS-Windows every morning and nothing worse will happen to you all day.