Subject: Re: SLIP w/ AmiTCP 4.0
To: amiga <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Michael L. Hitch <email@example.com>
Date: 12/10/1994 09:30:33
On Dec 10, 11:33am, Markus Illenseer wrote:
> On Dec 9, 4:02pm, "Michael K. Sanders" wrote:
> > 'slattach -s 9600 /dev/tty00'
> > 'ifconfig sl0 inet 18.104.22.168 -arp -trailer 22.214.171.124'
> > 'route add 126.96.36.199 -interface 188.8.131.52'
> I am not sure whether the route is really necessary. Last time i tried
> it using two NetBSD boxes, thisone wasn't required.
> Also i would suggest doing the ifconfig before the slattach.
Here's what I've used in the past. I think it worked the last time
I used it - I normally use PPP now.
slattach -m -h -s 38400 /dev/tty00
ifconfig sl0 inet 184.108.40.206 220.127.116.11 netmask 0xffffff00 -arp -trailers link0 up
The route shouldn't be necessary if you are only going to communicate
with the remote system. I know PPP sets up a route entry for the interface,
but I can't remember if SLIP does that as well.
Michael L. Hitch INTERNET: firstname.lastname@example.org
Office of Systems and Computing Services
Montana State University Bozeman, MT USA