>>>>> "Ty" == Ty Sarna <tsarna@endicor.com> writes:

>> I know of quite a few sites that would ditch StunOS 4.x in a second
>> for NetBSD if they could have NFS locking...

Ty> I think "mostly working" is the best that can obtained. Didn't
Ty> someone prove that the specified functionality is impossible to
Ty> implement?

I'm quite certain that's the case, at least for NFSv2.  I don't know
what specs there is for lockd & statd for NFSv2.  RFC1813 does cover
NFSv3's lock manager though, and I recall that the problem with NFSv2
was solved in there.  The NFSv3 impl. ready for BSD44, did it
implement locking?

Niklas