Subject: Re: disk ioctl's and checksums
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Niklas Hallqvist <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/28/1995 15:28:50
>>>>> "henson" == henson <email@example.com> writes:
henson> Second, should the checksum of a disklabel always be 0? Some
henson> of the functions in fd.c make the assumption that it should,
henson> but from looking at the code, I think they should check the
henson> calculated checksum against the checksum stored in the
henson> disklabel itself.
If you say what I think you are, it's the same thing, provided the
checksum is an XOR one. By checksumming a block via XOR and this
block contains a previously calculated checksum for the block
excluding the checksum itself, you will get zero as a result. Straigth
boolean algebra, try it...
However, I haven't checked the source, so I'm not sure this is the